State and Local Policy Database

Transit

Local jurisdictions and regional entities play an important role in funding and managing transit systems. Efficient transit systems with accessible and frequent service can provide additional transportation choices, significantly reduce residents’ need to drive, and reduce vehicle miles traveled.

This sub-category includes information on three topics: The transit agency(ies) that serve the community; Regional transit funding in comparison to city funding for roads and parking , in dollar values and normalized in per capita terms; and The number of transit rides per week available to the average resident of the community (Transit Connectivity Index from the H+T Affordability Index ).


The WMATA transit system that serves Arlingotn received $11,242,573 in total funding in 2013. This funding level is $743 per resident in the service territory of the agency.This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 2.03 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The City of Arlington’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 33,042, putting it in the second highest category (20,000 - 50,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: October 2015

The MARTA and GRTA transit systems that serve Atlanta received $802,347,407 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $584 per resident in the service territory of the agency. In comparison, 2012 spending on roads and parking by the city was $713,612,194 or $411 per city resident. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 7.37 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Atlanta’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 15, putting it in the third highest category (15-29) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The CapMetro transit system that serves Austin received $229,572,018 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $197.36 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 1.50 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Austin’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The MTA transit system that serves Baltimore received $1,113,857,814 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $143 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.37 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Baltimore’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 20, putting it in the third highest category (15-29) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The BJCTA-MAX transit system that serves Birmingham received $35,551,559 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $53.60 per resident in the service territory of the agency.This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.21 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Birmingham’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 1, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The MBTA transit system that serves Boston received $2,494,907,323 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $372.77 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 4.36 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Boston’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 31, putting it in the second highest category (30-39) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The GoBoulder transit system that serves Boulder received $1,247,174,724 in total funding in 2013. This funding level is $476 per resident in the service territory of the agency. We did not find funding made available from city funding sources only.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The City of Boulder’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 19,296, putting it in a high mid-range category (10,000 - 20,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: October 2015

The CCTA transit system that serves Burlington received $13,071,315 in total funding in 2011. This funding level is $139.57 per resident in the service territory of the agency. In comparison, 2010 spending on roads and parking by the city was $8,054,000, or $189.88 per city resident.  This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.74 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The City of Burlington’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 13,932, putting it in a high mid-range category (10,000 - 20,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: October 2015

The Chapel Hill Transit system that serves Carrboro received $19,276,792 in total funding in 2012.  This funding level is $240.31 per resident in the service territory of the agency.  In comparison, 2010 spending on roads and parking by the city was $1,311,500, or $66.98 per city resident.  This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 3.59 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The Town of Carrboro’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7,360, putting it in the lower category (5,000 - 10,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: April 2014

The CATS transit system that serves Charlotte received $388,013,893 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $353 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 2.26 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Charlotte’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 5, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

CAT and Jaunt, which both serve Charlottesville, received $17,348,437 in total funding in 2012. This funding level is $74.31 per resident in the service territory of the agency. In comparison, 2010 spending on roads and parking by the city was $ 4,706,571 or $108.26 per city resident. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.69 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. Charlottesville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 11,223, putting it in a high mid-range category (10,000 - 20,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: October 2015

The CTA and Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad transit systems that serve Chicago received $1,929,648,680 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $265.75 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.99 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Chicago’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 30, putting it in the second highest category (30-39) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The SORTA transit system that serves Cincinnati received $113,797,407 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $134.62 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.60 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Cincinnati’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The RTA transit system that serves Cleveland received $334,303,261 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $236.74 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 2.71 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Cleveland’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 14, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The COTA transit system that serves Columbus received $149,650,423 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $66.41 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 1.46 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Columbus’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 4, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The DART transit system that serves Dallas received $909,971,085 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $386 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 3.44 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Dallas’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 12, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The RTD-Denver transit system that serves Denver received $1,437,033,579 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $499 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 2.04 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Denver’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 13, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The SMART and Detroit Transportation Corporation transit system that serves Detroit received $148,801,446 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $43.45 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.32 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Detroit’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The transit system that serves received $7,076,860 in total funding in 2011. This funding level is $122.01 per resident in the service territory of the agency. In comparison, 2010 spending on roads and parking by the city was $15,864,000, or $307.22 per city resident.  This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.40 to 1.

Last Updated: October 2013

The City of El Paso transit system received $80,643,535 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $100.42 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 2.98 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of El Paso’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 3, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The FWTA transit system that serves Fort Worth received $130,655,514 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $158 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 1.17 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Fort Worth’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 2, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The transit systems that serve Hartford received $110,325,426 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $88.31 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.38 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Hartford’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 11, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The Harris County MTA, Harris County Community Services Department, Office of Transit Services, Harris County Improvement District, and Greater Southeast Management District transit systems that serve Houston received $767,153,839 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $155.16 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.89 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Houston’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

Last updated: December 2014

The IndyGo transit system that serves Indianapolis received $89,819,421 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $45.06 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.72 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Indianapolis’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 2, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The JTA transit system that serves Jacksonville received $117,897,225 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $117.74 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 1.33 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Jacksonville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 2, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The ATA transit system that serves Kansas City received $100,264,410 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $127.12 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 7.06 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Kansas City’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 4, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The KAT transit system that serves Knoxville received $34,086,340 in total funding in 2013. This funding level is $190.56 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 3.51 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The City of Knoxville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6,589, putting it in a lower category (5,000 - 10,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: October 2015

The RTC and Monorail Company transit systems that serve Las Vegas received $237,339,390 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $118.16 per resident in the service territory. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 1.09 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Las Vegas’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 3, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The transit system that serves received $9,978,222 in total funding in 2011. This funding level is $110.87 per resident in the service territory of the agency. In comparison, 2010 spending on roads and parking by the city was $7,529,000, or $85.91 per city resident.  This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 1.29 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The City of Knoxville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6,703, putting it in a lower category (5,000 - 10,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: October 2013

The Metrolink transit system that serves Los Angeles received $3,471,272,614 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $402.38 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 2.11 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Los Angeles’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 14, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The TA River City and Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Authority systems that serve Louisville received $95,875,309 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $81.85 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.34 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Louisville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

We did not locate Madison's transit and city highway funding data. 

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The City of Madison’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 15,482, putting it in a high mid-range category (10,000 - 20,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: October 2015

The MATA transit system that serves Memphis received $56,330,904 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $74.60 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 1.81 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Memphis’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 3, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The MDT transit system that serves Miami received $685,032,793 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $274.40 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 2.36 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Miami’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 20, putting it in the third highest category (15-29) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The MTS transit system that serves Milwaukee received $160,317,798 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $167.63 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.66 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Milwaukee’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 9, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The Metro Transit system that serves Minneapolis received $640,210,440 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $348.47 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.97 to 1. 

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Minneapolis’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 19, putting it in the third highest category (15-29) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The Metropolitan Transit District and Regional Transit Authority systems that serve Nashville received $84,677,199 in total funding in 2012. This funding level is $53.49 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.85 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Nashville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 2, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The RTA transit system that serves New Orleans received $108,581,821 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $294.06 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.88 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. New Orleans’

Transit Connectivity Index value is 13, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The MTA transit system that serves New York City received $12,481,543,328 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $1459.76 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 6.13 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. New York City’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 41, putting it in the highest category (>39) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The transit system that serves Oakland received a total of $1,612,672,147 in 2013. This funding normalizes to a ratio of 6.46 for regional transit funding per capita to local government funding of highways and parking per capita.

The transit connectivity index measures the number of train stations and bus stops within walking distance of households in a given Block group scaled by frequency of service. The city of Oakland’s average value was 17, putting it into the highest possible category (>16) available in our transit connectivity metric. 

Updated: February 2016 

The Central Oklahoma Transportation and Parking Authority transit system that serves Oklahoma City received $26,210,023 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $40.31 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of .30 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Oklahoma City’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 1, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority that serves Orlando received $133,341,537 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $66.48 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.28 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Orlando’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 4, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

We did not find information on transit funding for Park City. 

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. Park City’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 9,106, putting it in a lower category (5,000 - 10,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: October 2015

The SEPTA transit system that serves Philadelphia received $1,715,026,035 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $451.64 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 6.22 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Philadelphia’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 34, putting it in the second highest category (30-39) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The Valley Metro transit system that serves Phoenix received $196,628,226 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $54.18 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.46 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Phoenix’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 5, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The Port Authority of Allegheny County transit system that serves Pittsburgh received $443,107,301 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $274.51 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 26.54 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Pittsburgh’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 17, putting it in the third highest category (15-29) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The TriMet transit system that serves Portland received $665,249,047 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $426.22 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 13.05 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Portland’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 19, putting it in the third highest category (15-29) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The RIPTA transit system that serves Providence received $113,022,394 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $107.81 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 1.87 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Providence’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 11, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The CAT, NC State Transportation Department, and the Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation systems received $41,548,168 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $40.57 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.41 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Raleigh’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 2, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

GRTC received $51,603,570 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $114.78 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.89 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Richmond’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The Riverside Special Transportation, Riverside Transit Agency, and Riverside County Transportation Commission transit systems received $76,974,395 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $45.27 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.23 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Riverside’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 4, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The SACRT transit system that serves Sacramento received $258,710,866 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $249.77 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.73 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Sacramento’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 10, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The Utah Transit Authority that serves Salt Lake City received $366,927,446 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $194.81 per resident in the service territory of the agency. In comparison, 2011 spending on roads and parking by the city was $32,934,272 or $173.83 per city resident. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.88 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Salt Lake City’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 15, putting it in the third highest category (15-29) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The VIA transit system that serves San Antonio received $237,287,828 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $132.88 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 1.57 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. San Antonio’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 4, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The SDMTS transit system that serves San Diego received $548,757,079 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $109.82 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.64 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. San Diego’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 9, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The Golden Gate Bridge, Highway, and Transportation District, San Francisco Municipal Railway transit system that serves San Francisco received $1,014,171,453 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $1,167.06 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 2.71 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. San Francisco’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 46, putting it in the highest category (>39) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, and Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board transit systems that serve San Jose received $888,150,209 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $472.20 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 5.40 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. San Jose’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 12, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The key transit agencies that serve Seattle (King County DOT, City of Seattle Seattle Center Monorail Transit, Washington State Ferries, Central Puget Sound RTA, King County Ferry District) received $1,084,452,671 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $276.70 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.88 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Seattle’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 16, putting it in the third highest category (15-29) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The transit system that serves St. Louis received $317,04,556 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $195.96 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 1.76 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. St. Louis’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 12, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-14) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The HART transit system that serves Tampa received $83,746,714 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $34.95 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.18 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Tampa’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 4, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The transit system that serves Virginia Beach received $111,608,309 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $97.57 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.50 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Virginia Beach’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 2, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017

The WMATA transit system that serves Washington received $2,815,503,851 in total funding in 2015. This funding level is $613.83 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.71 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Washington DC’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 31, putting it in the second highest category (30-39) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: January 2017