State and Local Policy Database


State Scorecard Rank



24.5Scored out of 50Updated 9/2016
State Government
Score: 6 out of 7
State Government Summary List All

Colorado offers several consumer incentives for energy efficiency, as well as PACE financing. The state government leads by example through an energy savings target in public facilities, benchmarking energy usage in state buildings, requiring energy-efficient fleets, and encouraging energy savings performance contracting. Researched focused on energy efficiency takes place at several institutions in the state.

Financial Incentives List All

Financial Incentive information for Colorado is provided by the Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (DSIRE Coloradoand State Energy Office contacts. Information about additional incentives not present on DSIRE is listed here. In addition to the state-funded incentives on DSIRE and below, Colorado has enabled Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing and has one active program. For additional information on PACE, visit PACENation.

Colorado ENERGY STAR / Energy Saving Mortgage Program: The Energy Saving Mortgage Program incentivizes both the purchase of efficient homes and efficiency renovations in refinanced homes.  Home buyers can earn a credit of up to $8,000 on their mortgage for net-zero homes, or a percentage of that credit for homes scoring between a 50 and a zero on the Home Energy Rating System (HERS) Index Scale.  Renovations function similarly as home owners can earn up to $8,000 in incentives for efficiency retrofits to existing homes.

Green Colorado Credit Reserve (GCCR): The GCCR is a loan loss reserve that was created by the Colorado Energy Office to incentivize private lenders throughout Colorado to make small commercial loans up to $100,000 for capital improvements that promote energy efficiency and renewable energy. For each loan made by a participating lender, the GCCR will provide a loan loss reserve equal to 15% of the amount of the loan. 

Dairy and Irrigation Efficiency Pilot Program: Through this program launched in July 2015, the Colorado Energy Office (CEO) will engage the services of an experienced third-party contractor to provide free energy audits and technical support services to a minimum of 80 producers annually. CEO’s contractor will serve as the point of contact for the program and will assist producers in selecting and implementing cost-effective improvements that reduce energy use, environmental impacts, and producer operating costs. CEO will leverage the contractor’s role in this program to monitor individual producer and overall program progress and track and report on improvements, energy and cost savings, and GHG reductions.

Last Updated: July 2016

Building Energy Disclosure List All

There is no disclosure policy in place.

The Colorado Energy Office (CEO) has launched the Home Energy Score Initiative, a voluntary point of purchase home labeling effort.  As part of the continual training of real estate stakeholders, constant feedback has been given for the development of a low cost 3rd party asset rating. A low cost 3rd party asset rating provides three benefits: 1) Greater access to the market with reduced cost, 2) 3rd party verification that is important to appraisers when assessing a property / a property’s features, 3) an asset rating provides personal privacy on energy use by only looking at the components that make up a building as opposed to a rating or audit that includes actual utility data and consumption.

Last Updated: July 2016

Public Building Requirements List All

Executive Order D0011 07 ("Greening of State Government"), signed in 2007, charged State departments, agencies and offices to take a position of leadership in the by reducing state energy consumption. Specifically, the order set a goal that by fiscal year 2011-2012, state government achieve at least a 20 percent reduction in energy consumption of state facilities below fiscal year 2005-2006 levels. Executive Order D 2015-013, signed in 2015, renews this goal and requires all state agencies and departments to reduce energy consumption per square foot by 2% annually and at least 12% by FY 2020, from a baseline of FY 2015. This EO establishes a new Greening Government Leadership Council, tasked with supporting efforts to make government operations more sustainable. The Council consists of one representative from every state agency.

Executive Order D 005-05, signed in July 2005, requires all state government agencies and departments to adopt the LEED rating system for existing and new buildings to ensure reductions in energy use to the extent practical and cost effective. The executive order also requires an energy management program within state agencies to monitor and manage utility use and costs. Executive Order D2010-006 expanded this requirement, calling for all state buildings to track energy use, with the exception of higher-educational buildings due to their unique relationship with the state. Under this directive, agencies must provide details from tracking energy and water consumption to paper usage and reduction. K-12 schools are now subject to very high efficiency standards after the passage of SB 13-279 in 2013. The goal of this school efficiency bill is to create resource-efficient schools, which use 33% less energy and 32% less water that their conventional counterparts. 

Clean Energy Economy for the Region (CLEER) supports the tracking of energy use in public buildings through its Active Energy Management Program.  The program has helped schools and public buildings save 10-30% of their energy use without retrofits.  CLEER has assisted over 80 public buildings in western Colorado to track and manage their energy use.

The State of Colorado is in the process of setting one and five year goals in numerous areas including energy and water efficiency, petroleum reduction, environmentally preferable purchasing, and greenhouse gas emission reduction.  The State is also developing directives for agencies and departments that ensure successful achievement of the goals. These include the requirement that all agencies prepare annual energy and water management plans and that energy performance contracting feasibility studies be performed for all state-owned buildings

Last Updated: July 2016

Fleets List All

Executive Order D 0011 07 directs agencies to reduce petroleum consumption by state fleets by 25% by 2012, compared to FY 2005-2006 levels, while increasing fleet efficiency. Executive Order D 2015-013 renews this target, requiring a reduction in petroleum-based fuel consumption per vehicle 20% by 2020 from a baseline of FY 2015.

The Colorado Energy Office (CEO) recently completed a state fleet opportunity assessment.  The assessment provides recommendations for the state to purchase vehicles or other equipment and implement policies that would decrease lifecycle costs and reduce air emissions and petroleum consumption.  These include increased utilization of low-rolling resistance tires, idling reduction, and telematic deployment.

Based on results in the fleet opportunity assessment, the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and CEO are piloting idling reduction technologies in the state’s light- and heavy-duty trucks.  In addition, CDOT is in the process of incorporating telematics into all of its vehicles.  Telematics improve efficiency through behavioral changes, such as decreases in idling and high-speed driving, and maintenance optimization.

Additionally, CEO has the Refuel Colorado Fleet Coaching Program. The fleet coaches provide technical consulting to public and private fleets throughout the state. Energy coaches provide detailed analysis of fleets and create a business plan for efficient and alternative fuel vehicle adoption. Numerous state agencies are utilizing this service.

Last Updated: July 2016

Energy Savings Performance Contracting List All

Since the mid 1990’s, state agencies, institutions of higher education, and local governments have successfully used the Colorado Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) program to finance facility improvements with guaranteed savings.  It is authorized by state statutes and complies with other requirements, such as the state's Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) and federal Dodd Frank regulations, as well as industry standards. The Colorado Energy Office (CEO) implements all aspects of this program with high standards and industry collaboration.

As of June 2014, Colorado’s EPC Program portfolio included 182 active and completed construction projects, totaling $447.4 million in investments. Projects are benefiting communities across 75% of Colorado counties, guaranteeing $28.8 million in annual utility costs savings. 

Last Updated: July 2016

Research & Development List All

The Engines and Energy Conversion Lab (EECL) at Colorado State University has a stated mission to “create innovative energy solutions.” Two areas where this research focuses on efficiency include SmartGrid technology and engine efficiency, primarily in advanced ignition systems and after-treatment systems.  EECL is funded through numerous corporate sponsors.

The Institute for the Built Environment (IBE) at Colorado State University engages faculty and industry partners in healthy and sustainable building issues including energy efficient construction, integration of clean energy technologies and sustainable built environments.

The Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute (RASEI) at the University of Colorado at Boulder is a joint institute with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory with a mission to research and develop ways to produce energy at a lower cost, with higher efficiency, and with reduced emissions.

The Research in Delivery, Usage, and Control of Energy (ReDUCE) research group at the Colorado School of Mines includes energy efficiency projects such as the Cyber-Enabled Efficiency Energy Management of Structure (CEEMS), sponsored by the National Science Foundation, which conducts research onthe sensing and control of energy flow in buildings, as enabled by cyber infrastructure.

The Center for Renewable Energy Economic Development (CREED) is a catalyst for economic development in Colorado through clean energy and energy efficiency innovation and entrepreneurship. Its stakeholders support the creation and growth of cleantech companies throughout the State of Colorado and represent economic development, academia, incubators, industry associations, and government.  CREED is a product of National Renewable Energy (NREL) and partners with state government agencies such as the Colorado Energy Office (GEO) and the Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT), and industry groups such as the Colorado Cleantech Industry Association (CCIA).  The new CREED facility includes space for GEO and OEDIT and “hoteling” space for start-ups, venture capitalists, and business incubators.

NREL consistently works with Colorado universities on energy efficiency projects and plays a role in a number of collaborations throughout the state.  Besides RASEI and CREED, NREL also partners with state universities as part of the Colorado Energy Research Collaboratory, a research consortium that works with industry and public agencies to create and speed the commercialization of renewable energy technologies and energy efficiency.

The Energy Research Collaboratory has State $1 million in funding this year.  The Collaboratory defines the energy research as a consortium of three state institutions of higher education the University of Colorado at Boulder, Colorado State University, the Colorado School of Mines, and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Last Updated: July 2016

Score: 5 out of 7
Buildings Summary List All

Colorado is a home rule state with a voluntary building code for both residential and commercial construction, although there are minimum codes in place for jurisdictions that have adopted a code previously. As of June 2013, 95% of new buildings comply with the 2009 IECC standards or better. In addition, the average HERS Index Rating for single family residential homes in Colorado dropped from 59 to 57 over the last year, showing a 2% energy reduction.

Residential Codes List All

The 2003 IECC is a mandatory minimum for jurisdictions that have adopted a code previously. Jurisdictions that have not adopted or enforced codes are exempt from the 2003 IECC requirement, although the 2012 IECC is mandatory for all factory-built and multi-family structures – commercial and residential – in areas that do not adopt or enforce buildings codes. 95% of all residential new construction takes place in jurisdictions that have adopted the 2009 IECC or better.

Last Updated: June 2016

Commercial Code List All

The 2003 IECC is a mandatory minimum for jurisdictions that have adopted a code previously. Jurisdictions that have not adopted or enforced codes are exempt from the 2003 IECC requirement, although the 2012 IECC is mandatory for all factory-built and multi-family structures – commercial and residential – in areas that do not adopt or enforce buildings codes.

Last Updated: June 2016

Compliance List All
  • Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: The state completed the Colorado Strategic Compliance Plan in November 2011 with the Colorado Energy Code Compliance Collaborative. The Plan looks at state and local policies to improve codes throughout the state, reach out to consumers as well as realtors, appraisers and lenders, and train the relevant parties. This plan incorporates the long term goals of a gap analysis and the specific near term goals of a strategic compliance plan.
  • Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies: Colorado completed an evaluation of energy code compliance in the state in 2013. It found a rate of over 90% compliance for residential construction, noting that more work could be done with respect to HVAC systems. It also found that compliance with commercial codes was only 28%. This compliance study was prepared in conjunction with the Colorado Energy Code Compliance Collaborative, and is available on the Colorado Energy Office (CEO) website.
  • Utility Involvement: Colorado’s largest utility, Xcel Energy, is funding code-related activities with a budget of $25,000 per year for 2015 and 2016. It includes trainings across the state, purchase of code books for local jurisdictions, scholarships for building officials to attend ICC training and DOE codes conference, etc.
  • Stakeholder Advisory Group: The Colorado Energy Code Compliance Collaborative is heavily involved in building code compliance. The Collaborative’s mission is to facilitate compliance with local energy codes and to coordinate energy code actions and policies throughout the state. The Collaborative was originally started and supported with funding from BCAP. Now, it is self-supporting and meets on a quarterly basis.
  • Training/Outreach: The CEO provides basic energy code education for code officials and plan reviewers to understand changes in the code and typical issues with compliance. The CEO also provides designers, engineers, and architects training on energy codes to ensure they specify the correct equipment / design and properly identify the code compliance on the drawings or submittals.  This in turn makes it easier for plan reviews or permit counters to check code compliance. For builders the CEO provides direct technical assistance on plan review for builders to ensure their building can meet 2015 IECC and if not, the cost effective ways for builders to comply. The state has also developed an Energy Codes Support Partnership Tool Kit to guide counties through the process of adopting new codes or updating existing ones.

Last Updated: September 2016

Score: 1 out of 4
CHP Summary List All

Colorado has some policies in place to encourage CHP including interconnection and net metering rules. Two new CHP systems were installed in 2015.

Interconnection StandardsList All

Policy: Code of Colorado Regulations 723-3

Description: Modeled very closely on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERCinterconnection standard for small generators, Colorado’s interconnection standards are a product of its Renewable Energy Standard, adopted in 2005. Like the FERC standard, Colorado delineates three distinct tiers of interconnection to cover systems up to 10MW in size. CHP is explicitly eligible for interconnection under these standards. In the 2008, the Colorado House of Representatives enacted H.B. 1160, requiring municipal utilities to essentially adopt the PUC's interconnection rules.

The PUC adopted new rules for net metering in September 2009, as required by SB 51. The new rules made relaxed some of the insurance requirements for interconnection, and addressed utility concerns with highly seasonal circuits and voltage flicker.

Last Updated: June 2016

Encouraging CHP as a ResourceList All

There are currently no state policies designed to acquire energy savings from CHP (like other efficiency resources) or energy generation from CHP (in terms of kWh production) that apply to all forms of CHP.

Last Updated: June 2016

Deployment IncentivesList All

Incentives, grants, or financing:  CHP may be eligible for loans or other assistance from the Colorado Energy Office.

Net metering: Net metering rules apply to CHP in Colorado. Customer-generators are eligible for net metering in Colorado for retail renewable distributed generation, but different rules apply to investor-owned utilities (IOUs), municipal utilities, and electric cooperatives. All utilities are subject to the rules (except small municipal utilities) and credit net excess generation on the customer's next bill at the retail rate.

Last Updated: August 2016

Additional Supportive PoliciesList All

Some additional supportive policies exist to encourage CHP in Colorado. The state encourages the use of renewable-fueled CHP systems and waste heat to power (WHP), which qualify under Colorado’s Renewable Energy Standard.

In a December 2014 ruling, the Colorado Public Utilities Commission approved Public Service Company of Colorado, a subsidiary of Xcel Energy, to provide financial incentives to industrial facilities for WHP in Colorado. The ruling allows Xcel Energy to pay an incentive of about $500 per kilowatt of recycled energy over 10 years, thereby reducing the payback period on a company’s initial investment. Individual projects can be as large as 10 megawatts, and there is no minimum project size.

Last Updated: June 2016

Score: 7.5 out of 20
Utilities Summary List All

Colorado’s utilities administer a growing portfolio of energy efficiency programs with oversight by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). The state enacted legislation in 2007 requiring the PUC to establish energy savings goals for gas and electric utilities (thereby creating an EERS) and to give investor-owned utilities a financial incentive for implementing cost-effective efficiency programs. Both Xcel Energy, which is the largest investor-owned utility (IOU) in the state and operates as the Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo), and Black Hills Energy, the other IOU, have expanded their demand-side management (DSM) programs in recent years. The utilities file DSM plans annually, and are working toward the most recent EERS targets which ramp up to 1.35% in 2015 and reach 1.68% in 2020. Colorado implemented natural gas programs in 2008. There is no decoupling for electric or gas utilities, The PUC has also created incentives to reward utilities that create efficiency programs for electricity and natural gas and that meet or exceed energy savings goals.  In 2013, the Colorado PUC began a process to revisit certain aspects of the goals and incentive mechanisms for PSCo in Docket 13A-0686EG.

The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables.

Last updated: September 2016

Customer Energy Efficiency Programs List All

Funding for energy efficiency has increased substantially in Colorado in recent years since the state adopted an EERS in 2007. Xcel Energy (operating as Public Service of Colorado (PSCo)) is the major investor-owned utility (IOU) in Colorado and administers its programs after they have been approved by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. Xcel Energy’s programs are funded by a demand-side management Cost Adjustment Mechanism rate rider. Black Hills Energy is the other IOU that serves electricity to customers in the state and generally follows Xcel Energy’s energy efficiency savings targets. Holy Cross Energy, a rural electric cooperative utility, approved a portfolio of energy efficiency programs for 2012-2016 that will achieve savings equal about 0.5% of retail sales per year. 

Natural gas programs are also available in Colorado. The 2007 state legislation required that the Colorado Public Utilities Commission set energy savings goals for natural gas, which are commensurate with spending targets of at least 0.5% of prior year’s revenues.

The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables.

Last Updated: September 2016

Energy Efficiency as a Resource List All

Energy efficiency is not included within the commission’s definition of a supply-side resource in the Rules Regulating Electric Utilities. However, in one of Public Service Company’s Electric Resource Plan filings, it appears that the commission required the company to modify its plan to include modeling for approved DSM programs (Docket No. 07A-447E, Decision No. C08-0929). House Bill 1164 requires the PUC to include the possible impacts of future greenhouse gas regulation on electricity prices when evaluating utility resource plans.

Last Updated: September 2016

Energy Efficiency Resource Standards List All

Summary: Electric: PSCo savings targets of 0.8% of sales in 2011, increasing to 1.35% of sales in 2015, after which time a flat goal of 400 GWh per year is in place through 2020. Black Hills follows PSCo targets. Natural Gas: Savings targets commensurate with spending targets (at least 0.5% of prior year’s revenue).

The Colorado legislature passed HB-07-1037 in April 2007, which amended Colorado statutes C.R.S. 40-1-102 and 40-3.2-101-105 by requiring the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (COPUC) to establish energy savings goals for investor-owned electric and gas utilities.  The EERS statute does not set a fixed schedule of statewide percentages of energy savings to be achieved by particular years, nor does it require the acquisition of all cost-effective energy efficiency resources. Instead, it sets an overall multi-year statewide goal for investor-owned electric utilities of at least five percent of the utility's retail sales in the base year (2006) to be met by the end of 2018, counting savings in 2018 and including savings from DSM measures installed starting in 2006.  The statute includes a similar goal for reduction of peak demand of 5% the retail system peak in 2006. For gas utilities, the statute required the PUC to open a new proceeding to develop gas savings targets and spending levels. The law empowers the PUC to set interim goals for utilities and to modify goals.

COPUC has modified targets several times since 2008 (see Docket No. 07A-420E, Decision C08-0560Docket No. 08A-518E, Decision No. R09-0542). In May 2011, COPUC approved new goals for Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) for the 2012-2020 period. The goals begin at 1.14% of sales in 2012, ramping up to 1.35% in 2015, and reaching 1.68% in 2020. The goals set out to achieve 3,984 GWh in the nine-year period (see Docket No. 10A-554EG, Decision No. C11-0442). Black Hills Energy’s adopted efficiency plan follows PSCo targets. In 2013, the Colorado PUC began a process to revisit certain aspects of the goals and incentive mechanisms for PSCo in Docket 13A-0686EG, and laid out a flat annual savings target of 400 GWh through 2020 in Decision No. C14-0731.

For investor-owned natural gas utilities, the EERS legislation structured the requirement in two parts. First, the natural gas IOU’s must set DSM spending targets of more than 0.5% of revenues from customers in the prior year. Energy savings targets are then established by COPUC commensurate with spending and stated in terms of quantity of gas saved per dollar of efficiency program spending.

Last Updated: September 2016

Utility Business Model List All

All investor-owned natural gas utilities in Colorado recover lost revenues through an Acknowledgement of Lost Revenues (ALR) mechanism. The gas DSM rules were proposed in Proceeding No. 07R-371G and adopted in Decision No. C08-0248 which was issued on March 7, 2008. The ALR is only calculated for first year savings. Electric utilities do not recover lost revenues. 

The 2009/10 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan was intended to remove disincentives to efficiency, offset revenue and earnings erosion and reward utility performance, among other things for the Public Service Company of Colorado. The PUC indicated that it is not appropriate and likely not feasible to define in a docket the lost margins resulting from DSM.  Instead it addressed the financial disincentives of DSM with a fixed payment of $2 million after taxes (approximately 3.2. million gross) for each year that 80% of the annual energy savings goal for an approved DSM plan is achieved. This amount is recovered over the 12 month period following the year in which the DSM plan is implemented. The PUC specifically notes that this “disincentive offset” should not be considered lost margin recovery, but is an annual bonus for meeting approved DSM goals. The $2 million disincentive offset can be adjusted downward in future years if the 80% target is not met although it was reported that the 80% target is so easily achieved as to make the payment almost automatic upon DSM program implementation. Incentives are also included in the mechanism and utilities achieving efficiency targets can earn a percentage of the net economic benefits generated by those savings. Combined total incentive payments are capped at 20% of PSCo’s annual DSM expenditures.

In 2011, the Colorado Public Utilities Commission issued Decision No. C11-0442 into Docket No. 10A-554EG to change some aspects of the incentives package for PSCo. The Commission agreed to increase the pre-tax disincentive offset from $3.2 million to $5 million if the utility meets or exceeds 100% of its electric energy savings goals. PSCo will continue to receive a pre-tax disincentive offset of $3.2 million for performance relative to its electric energy savings goals in the range from 80-99%.

The 2009/10 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan, approved in 2008, included a three-part incentive package that included a $2 million “disincentive offset” for each year that Public Service Colorado implement an approved DSM plan, a performance incentive and cost recovery via a rider on a prospective basis. A similar three-part package was approved for Black Hills. In each case the performance incentives are available for achieving efficiency targets. The incentive (including the disincentive offset) was capped at 20% of PSCo’s annual DSM expenditures. In 2011, the performance incentive was modified, with utilities recieving a percentage of net economic benefits on a sliding scale based on achievement of savings goals. In 2014, these PSCo incentives were again modified. Under current rules, PSCo recieves a flat 5% of net economic benefits once 100% of savings goals are achieved (See Proceeding No. 13A-0686EG Decision C14-0731).

For natural gas utilities, the incentive bonus is capped at 25% of the expenditures or 20% of the net economic benefits of the DSM programs, whichever amount is lower.

Last Updated: September 2016

Evaluation, Measurement, & Verification List All
  • Cost-effectiveness test(s) used: TRC
  • Uses a deemed savings database: no

The evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs in Colorado relies on regulatory orders. Evaluations are administered by the utilities. Colorado has established formal rules and procedures for evaluation. The utilities submit a set of technical assumptions as part of their respective plan filings, which are approved by the Commission; see Stipulation and Settlement Agreement in Public Service Company Docket No. 08A-366EG. Statewide evaluations are conducted. Colorado relies on the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test and considers it to be its primary cost-effectiveness test. The rules for benefit-cost tests are stated in PUC HB 07-1037. These benefit-cost tests are required for overall portfolio and total program level screening.

Last Updated: September 2016

Guidelines for Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs List All

Requirements for State and Utility Support of Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs

No specific level of spending is required, although utilities and the state offer a variety of low-income programs.

In 2007, the Colorado General Assembly passed HB 1037, which in addition to establishing energy savings goals for utilities also instructed them to make sure that low-income customers had access to DSM programs. This was codified in Colorado statute 40-3.2.104, which directs utilities to provide funding for low-income energy-assistance programs such as bill assistance and weatherization through the assessment of a public benefits charge.

This funding is administered by the Colorado Energy Assistance Foundation (now Energy Outreach Colorado), created under section 40-8.5-104. Energy Outreach Colorado is required to file a report with the commission annually showing amounts of money collected under the public benefits charge and demonstrating that the funds were used towards low-income energy bill payment assistance and energy efficiency improvements for affordable housing and non-profit facilities.

Cost-Effectiveness Rules for Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs

Decision No. C08-0560 directs the Colorado Public Service Commission to pursue all cost-effective low-income DSM programs, “but to not forego DSM programs simply because they do not pass a 1.0 TRC test.” It also directs that, in applying the TRC to low-income DSM programs, “the benefits included in the calculation shall be increased by 20%, to reflect the higher level of non-energy benefits that are likely to accrue from DSM services to low-income customers.”

To avoid unintended impacts to calculations of benefits pursuant to performance incentives, the decision also allows utilities to exclude these costs in these determinations: “To address this concern we find that the costs and benefits associated with any low-income DSM program that is approved and has a TRC below 1.0 may be excluded from the calculation of net economic benefits. Further, the energy and demand savings may be applied toward the calculation of overall energy and demand savings, for purposes of determining progress toward annual goals.”

Coordination of Ratepayer-Funded Low-Income Programs with WAP Services

The Colorado Commission on Low-Income Energy Assistance is responsible for coordinating the state’s low-income energy assistance services pursuant to C.R.S.§ 40-8.5-103.5 and Executive Order D 026 07. Many Colorado utilities have decided to enter into agreements with the Colorado Energy Office, the federal Weatherization Assistance Program grantee, and/or non-profits like Energy Outreach Colorado or community action agencies. In these instances, the funds generated by monthly surcharges are given to these other entities to provide services to the utility’s low-income customers.

Last updated: April 2017

Self Direct and Opt-Out Programs List All

Self-direct programs for large customers are offered by Xcel Energy and Black Hills.

Xcel's self-direct program is available to commercial and industrial electric customers who have an aggregated peak load of at least 2 MW in any single month and an aggregated annual energy consumption of at least 10 GWh and are not allowed to participate in other conservation products offered by the Company. Rebates are paid based on actual savings from a project, up to $525 per customer kW or $0.10 per kWh; rebates are given for either peak demand or energy savings but not both and are limited to 50% of the incremental cost of the project. Xcel uses raw monitoring results and engineering calculations to demonstrate actual energy and demand savings based on monitoring results.

To participate in the C&I Self-Direct program offered by Black Hills, customers must have an aggregated peak load greater than 1 MW in any single month and aggregated annual energy usage of 5,000 MWh.  Rebates and savings are calculated on a case-by-case basis; rebate values are calculated as either 50% of the incremental cost of the project of $0.30 per kWh savings, whichever is lower. 

More information on large customer self-direct programs can be found in the ACEEE report, Follow the Leaders: Improving Large Customer Self-Direct Programs.

Last Updated: Sepember 2016

Data AccessList All

Colorado has no policy in place that requires utilities to release energy use data to customers or third parties. 

Last Updated: September 2016 

Score: 4.5 out of 10
Transportation Summary List All

In 2013, Colorado passed legislation that allows the entire local share of the Highway Users Tax Fund to be used for public transit, bicycle, and pedestrian investments. The state also has incentives for high-efficiency vehicles.

Tailpipe Emission Standards List All

No policy in place or proposed.

Last Updated: July 2015

Transportation System Efficiency List All

Transportation and Land use Integration: No policy in place or proposed.

VMT Targets: No policy in place or proposed.

Complete Streets: The state has implemented a complete streets policy (HB 1147) to promote the use of alternative transportation by providing a comprehensive network of roads and streets.

MAP 21 Freight Plans and Goals: Colorado also has a comprehensive state freight plan but it does not highlight concrete freight system efficiency strategies or include efficiency performance measures. . 

Last Updated: June 2016

Transit Funding List All

Colorado adopted the FASTER legislation in 2009, which created a State Transit and Rail fund that accumulates $5 million annually. The legislation also allocated $10 million a year from the Highway Users Tax Fund to the maintenance and creation of transit facilities.

The state subsequently passed SB 48 in 2013, which allowed for the entire local share of the Highway Users Trust Fund (derived from state gas tax and registration fees) to be used for public transit and bicycle or pedestrian investments.

LLast Updated: July 2015

Incentives for High-Efficiency Vehicles List All

In 2013, the state of Colorado extended H.B. 1331 to provide financial incentives to purchasers of efficient motor vehicles out to 2021. Consumers can claim up to $6,000 in tax credits for the purchase of a hybrid, plug-in hybrid or alternative fuel vehicle. Individuals that convert a personal vehicle to plug-in hybrid technology can claim up to $7,500. Credit amounts are dependent upon the incremental or conversion cost of the alternative fuel or hybrid vehicle. Credits are also available for the purchase of all-electric or plug-in electric medium- and heavy-duty vehicles

Last Updated: July 2015

Appliance Standards
Score: 0.5 out of 2
Appliance Standards Summary List All

Policy: CRS § 6-7.5-101 et seq.

Description: In 2014, the Colorado state legislature adopted SB 14-103, An Act Concerning the Phase-Out of the Sale of Certain Low-Efficiency Plumbing Fixtures. The policy requires the sale of plumbing fixtures meeting WaterSense standards for lavatory faucets, toilets, urinals and showerheads. These standards are set to go into effect in September 2016.

Last Updated: July 2016