State and Local Policy Database

Transit

Local jurisdictions and regional entities play an important role in funding and managing transit systems. Efficient transit systems with accessible and frequent service can provide additional transportation choices, significantly reduce residents’ need to drive, and reduce vehicle miles traveled.

This sub-category includes information on three topics: The transit agency(ies) that serve the community; Regional transit funding in comparison to city funding for roads and parking , in dollar values and normalized in per capita terms; and The number of transit rides per week available to the average resident of the community (Transit Connectivity Index from the H+T Affordability Index ).


Transportation Funding

The ABQ Ride and RMRTD transit systems that serve Albuquerque have received $25,344,917 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $28 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the fourth highest category ($20-49) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Albuquerque’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 5, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

The average spending from 2011 to 2015 in the largest transit system serving Arlington County amounts to a total of $28,993,895. Considering the Metropolitan Statistical Area population, this funding amounts to $4.75 of transit spending per capita.

Arlington County has a Transit Connectivity Index of 26.

Last updated: May 2017

Transportation Funding

The MARTA and GRTA transit systems that serve Atlanta have received $296,004,462 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $51.92 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the third highest category ($50-99) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Atlanta’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7.9, putting it in the third highest category (7-7.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

We could not determine how much per capita Aurora spends on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Aurora’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6.6, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The CapMetro transit system that serves Austin has received $122,903,253.60 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $61.43 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the third highest category ($50-99) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Austin’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 5.1, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The GET and KT transit systems that serve Bakersfield have received $13,936,143.40 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $15.86 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the lowest category ($0-19) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Bakersfield’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 4.4, putting it in the lowest category (0-4.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The MTA transit system that serves Baltimore has received $431,943,389.40 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $154.70 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the highest category (greater than $150) available in the transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Baltimore’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 8.9, putting it in the second highest category (8-8.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The BJCTA-MAX transit system that serves Birmingham received $18,219,052.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $15.92 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the lowest category ($0-19) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Birmingham’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 0.9, putting it in the lowest category (0-4.99) available in transit connectivity. 

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The MBTA transit system that serves Boston has received $1,047,022,892.40 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $219.41 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the highest category ($150 or more) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Boston’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 9.4, putting it in the highest category (9 or larger) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

The GoBoulder transit system that serves Boulder received $1,247,174,724 in total funding in 2013. This funding level is $476 per resident in the service territory of the agency. We did not find funding made available from city funding sources only.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The City of Boulder’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 19,296, putting it in a high mid-range category (10,000 - 20,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: October 2015

Transportation Funding

The GBT and BPT transit systems that serve Bridgeport have received $13,400,412.20 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $14.15 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the lowest category ($0-19) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Bridgeport’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7, putting it in the third highest category (7-7.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The NFT transit system that serves Buffalo has received $945,959,442.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $832.22 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the highest category ($150 or more) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Buffalo’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7.9, putting it in the third highest category (7-7.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

The CCTA transit system that serves Burlington received $13,071,315 in total funding in 2011. This funding level is $139.57 per resident in the service territory of the agency. In comparison, 2010 spending on roads and parking by the city was $8,054,000, or $189.88 per city resident.  This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.74 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The City of Burlington’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 13,932, putting it in a high mid-range category (10,000 - 20,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: October 2015

The Chapel Hill Transit system that serves Carrboro received $19,276,792 in total funding in 2012.  This funding level is $240.31 per resident in the service territory of the agency.  In comparison, 2010 spending on roads and parking by the city was $1,311,500, or $66.98 per city resident.  This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 3.59 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The Town of Carrboro’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7,360, putting it in the lower category (5,000 - 10,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: April 2014

Transportation Funding

The CATS transit system that serves Charlotte received $168,898,707.20 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $68.77 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the third highest category ($50-99) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Charlotte’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 4.2, putting it in the lowest category (0-4.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

CAT and Jaunt, which both serve Charlottesville, received $17,348,437 in total funding in 2012. This funding level is $74.31 per resident in the service territory of the agency. In comparison, 2010 spending on roads and parking by the city was $ 4,706,571 or $108.26 per city resident. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.69 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. Charlottesville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 11,223, putting it in a high mid-range category (10,000 - 20,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: October 2015

Transportation Funding

The CTA and Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad transit systems that serve Chicago have received $740,641,929 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $77.56 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the third highest category ($50-99) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Chicago’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 9.1, putting it in the highest category (greater than 9) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The CVT transit system that serves Chula Vista has received $749,084.00 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $0.23 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the lowest category ($0-19) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Chula Vista’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The SORTA transit system that serves Cincinnati received $42,583,002.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $19.74 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the lowest category ($0-19) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Cincinnati’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6.8, putting it in the third highest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The RTA transit system that serves Cleveland has received $137,272,647.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $66.55 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the third highest category ($50-99) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Cleveland’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7.6, putting it in the third highest category (7-7.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The COTA transit system that serves Columbus received $76,916,480.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $38.01 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the fourth highest category ($20-49) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Columbus’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 5.1, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The DART transit system that serves Dallas received $323,306,604.60 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $45.51 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the fourth highest category ($20-49) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Dallas’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 6.8, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The RTD-Denver transit system that serves Denver has received $487,004,064.40 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level equates to $174.01 per resident in the service territory of the agency which puts Denver in the highest category (>$150) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Denver’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7.9, putting it in the third highest category (7-7.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The SMART and Detroit Transportation Corporation transit system that serves Detroit have received $77,945,453.20 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $18.11 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the lowest category ($0-19) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Detroit’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6.8, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

The transit system that serves received $7,076,860 in total funding in 2011. This funding level is $122.01 per resident in the service territory of the agency. In comparison, 2010 spending on roads and parking by the city was $15,864,000, or $307.22 per city resident.  This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 0.40 to 1.

Last Updated: October 2013

Transportation Funding

The City of El Paso transit system received $37,124,130.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $44.27 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the fourth highest category ($20-49) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of El Paso’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 5.1, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The FWTA transit system that serves Fort Worth has received $86,335,801.40 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $12.15 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the lowest category ($0-19) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Fort Worth’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 3, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The Rapid transit system that serves Grand Rapids has received $24,055,928.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $23.15 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the second lowest category ($20-49) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Grand Rapid’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6.6, putting it in the second lowest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The transit systems that serve Hartford have received $65,147,473.20 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $53.70 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the third highest category ($50-99) in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Hartford’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7.8, putting it in the third highest category (7-7.99) in transit connectivity.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

We could not determine how much per capita Henderson spends on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Henderson’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 3.2, putting it in the lowest category (0-4) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The DTS transit system that serves Honolulu has received $346,993,354.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $350.98 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the highest category (greater than $150) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Honolulu’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 7.9, putting it in the third highest category (7-7.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The Harris County MTA, Harris County Community Services Department, Office of Transit Services, Harris County Improvement District, and Greater Southeast Management District transit systems that serve Houston have received $280,267,321 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $42.23 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the fourth highest category (20-49) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Houston’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6.1, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The IndyGo transit system that serves Indianapolis has received $37,679,165.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $18.94 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the lowest category ($0-19) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Indianapolis’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 4, putting it in the lowest category (0-4.99) available in transit connectivity.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The JTA transit system that serves Jacksonville received $52,219,951.60 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $36.07 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the fourth highest category ($20-49) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Jacksonville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 3.8, putting it in the lowest category (0-4.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The ATA transit system that serves Kansas City has received $75,798,286.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $36.29 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the second lowest category ($20-49) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Kansas City’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 4.8, putting it in the lowest category (0-4.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

The KAT transit system that serves Knoxville received $34,086,340 in total funding in 2013. This funding level is $190.56 per resident in the service territory of the agency. This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 3.51 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The City of Knoxville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6,589, putting it in a lower category (5,000 - 10,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: October 2015

Transportation Funding

Knoxville spends $77.30 per capita on transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Knoxville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 4.1, putting it in the lowest category (0-4.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: May 2019

Transportation Funding

The RTC and Monorail Company transit systems that serve Las Vegas have received $128,992,014 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $61.06 per resident in the service territory, putting it in the third highest category ($50-99) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Las Vegas’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 5.1, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-6.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

The transit system that serves received $9,978,222 in total funding in 2011. This funding level is $110.87 per resident in the service territory of the agency. In comparison, 2010 spending on roads and parking by the city was $7,529,000, or $85.91 per city resident.  This results in a ratio of per capita regional transit funding to per capita city highway and parking funding of 1.29 to 1.

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The City of Knoxville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6,703, putting it in a lower category (5,000 - 10,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: October 2013

Transportation Funding

The LBT transit system that serves Long Beach has received $38,025,190.40 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $2.87 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the lowest category ($0-19) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Long Beach’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 9, putting it in the highest category (greater than 9) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The Metrolink transit system that serves Los Angeles has received $1,337,022,675.20 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $100.82 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the second highest category ($100-149) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Los Angeles’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 7.7, putting it in the third highest category (7-7.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The TA River City and Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Authority systems that serve Louisville have received $38,091,174 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $29.80 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the fourth highest category ($20-49) in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Louisville’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 6.4, putting it in the fourth highest category (5-6.99) in transit connectivity.

Last Updated: March 2019

We did not locate Madison's transit and city highway funding data. 

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. The City of Madison’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 15,482, putting it in a high mid-range category (10,000 - 20,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: October 2015

Transportation Funding

The Metro McAllen transit system that serves McAllen has received $2,869,059.60 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $3.42 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the lowest category ($0-19) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Fort Worth’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 3.2, putting it in the lowest category (0-4.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The MATA transit system that serves Memphis received $24,703,700.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $18.38 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the lowest category ($0-19) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Memphis’ Transit Connectivity Index value is 4.1, putting it in the lowest category (0-4.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The COM transit system that serves Mesa has received $850,235.67 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $0.19 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting the city in the lowest category ($0-19) available in transit funding.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. The City of Mesa’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 4.1, putting it in the lowest category (0-4.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

The MDT transit system that serves Miami received $273,580,143.80 in average annual funding from 2013-2017. This funding level is $45.45 per resident in the service territory of the agency, putting it in the fourth highest category ($20-49) available in the City Scorecard.

Access to Transit Services

The Transit Connectivity Index measures transit service levels. It is based on the number of bus routes and train stations within walking distance for households scaled by frequency of service. Miami’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 8.7, putting it in the second highest category (8-8.99) available in the City Scorecard.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Milwaukee spends an average of $42.04 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 7.6 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Minneapolis spends an average of $67.70 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 8.5 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Nashville spends an average of $19.80 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 3.6 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

New Haven spends an average of $30.48 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 7.1 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

New Orleans spends an average of $93.51 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 7.4 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

New York City spends an average of $253.85 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 9.6 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Newark spends an average of $80.33 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 8.7 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Oakland spends an average of $108.09 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 8.3 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Oklahoma City spends an average of $14.82 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 2.6 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Omaha spends an average of $13.80 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 5.0 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Orlando spends an average of $28.32 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 7.1 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

We did not find information on transit funding for Park City. 

The Transit Connectivity Index measures how many transit rides are available per week within walking distance from the average household. Park City’s Transit Connectivity Index value is 9,106, putting it in a lower category (5,000 - 10,000) available in the City Scorecard.

Last updated: October 2015

Transportation Funding

Philadelphia spends an average of $123.08 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 9.0 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Phoenix spends an average of $22.38 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 5.7 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Pittsburgh spends an average of $83.97 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 8.3 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Portland spends an average of $101.36 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 8.4 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Providence spends an average of $32.80 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 7.5 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Raleigh spends an average of $12.20 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 4.8 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Reno spends an average of $42.27 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 3.8 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Richmond spends an average of $34.66 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 7.7 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Riverside spends an average of $8.29 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 5.3 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Rochester spends an average of $34.19 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 6.6 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Sacramento spends an average of $37.85 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 6.4 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Saint Paul spends an average of $8.79 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 8.0 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Salt Lake City spends an average of $160.26 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 7.9 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

San Antonio spends an average of $55.41 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 5.5 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

San Diego spends an average of $45.51 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 6.0 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

San Francisco spends an average of $109.49 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 9.6 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

San Jose spends an average of $167.84 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 7.2 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Seattle spends an average of $157.29 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 8.1 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

St. Louis spends an average of $47.15 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 7.6 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

St. Petersburg spends an average of $10.22 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 4.9 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Tampa spends an average of $23.50 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 5.4 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Tucson spends an average of $10.94 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 5.8 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Tulsa spends an average of $15.85 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 3.6 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Virginia Beach spends an average of $28.46per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 3.0 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Washington DC spends an average of $170.27 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 9.3 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019

Transportation Funding

Worcester spends an average of $25.64 per capita on transit.

Access to Transit Services

The city has an All Transit Performance score of 4.8 out of 10.

Last Updated: March 2019